Philosopher's Insular System Error

It seems as if those who construct all-inclusive, insular philosophical systems attempt to control others like individuals who create chaos in different ways try to manipulate and control people. Do those players have other intentions, motives, objectives and aims (for example purist philosophical aspirations to devise the final, absolute all-explanatory philosophical, metaphysical and ontological system by means of immaculate methods, logical, sound reasoning and valid arguments and argumentation) as well, apart from the need to manipulate, and be the master of others and their control goals?What, if any, is the intended relationship of such insular systems with 'the real world', the universe or multiverse, the Kantian 'reality-in-itself', the life-worlds of cultures, sub-cultures, societies, communities, individuals, other socio-cultural practices, discourses and disciplines?How are such insular philosophical systems meant to fit, relate to, mirror, express, reveal, explain, conceptualize reality, other realities, life worlds, the multiverse? Are they accompanied by or do they come with codes or rules, systems or models of transformation, interpretation and application to be related to 'the real world', other theories, systems and models of the universe, reality and life-worlds?